Social Networking Sites ( Sns ) - 1207 Words

Have you heard of Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snap Chat, or Myspace? It is probably safe to say most of us have heard of one of these, if not all of these social networking sites (SNS). If by chance, you are unfamiliar with SNS, they are online based social exchange websites. Anyone can get a profile on anyone of the sites mentioned above with a valid email address, unless under the age of thirteen. (Phillips, 2007) SNS give an individual an area to create a profile, that allows them to place their picture, input personal data, update their statuses, post pictures, videos, and comment on others posts. Facebook for instance allows instant messaging, voice calling, and video calling from inside the Facebook profiles, to other Facebook users. People accept and deny requests from each other ultimately creating a circle of enmeshed groups of people with alike interests, locations, hobbies, beliefs, or â€Å"friends†. Adolescents being impressionable and impulsive in their behaviors already, having so much access to all kinds of different social taboos, risky behaviors, and unsupervised and unmonitored interactions, could be a detrimental thing to these youth. Has Facebook influenced adolescent high-risk behaviors? According to Statista.com (2015) as of the 3rd quarter of 2015 there is 1.55 billion active monthly Facebook users with Facebook being the most popular SNS worldwide. Lenhart (2015) states that 91% of adolescents between the ages of 13 and 17 have access to theShow MoreRelatedImpact Of Online Networking On Young Generation1426 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction 3 2.0 Discussion 4 2.1 Extent Use of Social 7 2.2 Implications for Future Study 8 3.0 Research questions 9 4.0 Glossary of terms 10 5.0 References 11 6.0 Biblography 12 â€Æ' 1.0 Introduction New improvements in the scientific world have built the web a creative manner for individuals groups to broadcast. Online networking systems have made a wonder on the web that has earn demand over last ten years. Individuals use online networking sites, for example, Twitter, Myspace and Facebook toRead MoreA CASE STUDY OF THE INFLUENCE OF FAMILY ON FIRST- GENERATION COLLEGE STUDENTS‚Äà ´ EDUCATIONAL ASPIRATIONS POST HIGH SCHOOL1560 Words   |  7 Pagesï » ¿Impact of Social Networking Sites Usage on Student’s Academic Performance in Pakistan Abstract Purpose – This research paper examines the impact of the usage of social networking sites (SNS) on the academic performance of the students in universities. The impact has been studied in relation to three variables acting as moderators to the usage of social networking sites which in turn helps to enquire the variation of academic performance of the students regarding that usage. The Independent variableRead MoreIntelligence Survey Method1187 Words   |  5 Pagesand a Social Intelligence test. Secondary Data have been collected through various Journals, books internet which are restricted to the conceptual framework of the paper only. Sampling design The population has comprised of Higher Secondary School Students in Palakkad District. A convenient sampling size of 360 students of respondents has been selected using stratified random sampling. Tools SNS usage inventory developed and standardised by the investigator was used for getting the SNS usageRead MoreHow Personality Influences What Type Of Sns A Person Will Likely Use1545 Words   |  7 Pagesof literature on social networking sites (SNS) and the question of the impacts it has on sociality has increased significantly in recent years. As a result, greater levels of variable specification is required. Testing the relationships among key variables is important when trying to understand the influential impact of these technological forums. With a recent growth in SNS such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram there is a distinct lack of psychological theory relating to SNS use. Although researchRead MoreBenefits Of Social Networking Systems Essay1201 Words   |  5 Pages3.2. Benefits of Social Networking Systems There are many benefits associated with social networking systems. Some of them are discussed below: 3.2.1. Media Literacy Traditionally, media literacy was taught in schools discussing its various aspects such as media ownership, censorship and advertising. However, today’s media networks which usually operate online require more complex understanding of digital work that is not generally taught in schools. It requires that individual learn and participateRead MoreWhy Sns May Affect One s Self Esteem And Well Being904 Words   |  4 PagesAlthough minor and misinterpreted, SNS might affect one’s self-esteem and well-being. Proceeding the argument about self-disclose, Gonzales and Hancockput (2011) suggest that honest self-presentation is positively associated with well-being since most of people who engage in self-disclose are interested in creating and maintain social ties. A study suggests that by engaging in honest self-presentation, people increase their social perspective and wider their need of social support. This indeed influenceRead MoreSocial Media And Its Effects On A Large Sca le Essay1675 Words   |  7 Pagesinteraction, is becoming less and less important as social media has provoked false senses of connection, which may lead to negative physical or psychological predicaments. Who is your primary audience or reader? Why? Be detailed in your answer about your audience. My primary audiences are employees responsible for the management of online content, and professionals in the field of Criminal Justice that have an interest in the risks of social networking. Parents of children and young people aged betweenRead MoreHow Older Participants Perceive Facebook1102 Words   |  5 Pagesglobalisation of social media, Facebook and other social networking sites (SNS), researchers have taken an interest in studying the nature of how people utilise SNS especially with regard to age disparities. However, there is a lack of qualitative research that investigates participants’ values and perceptions of SNS (Pfeil, Arjan and Zaphiris 2009). The purpose of this research is to explore this question by investigating the influence of age on participants perceptions of the SNS, Facebook. FacebookRead MoreSocial Networking: Does It Do More Good to Us Than Bad1063 Words   |  5 PagesSocial Networking: Does it do More Good to Us than Bad? Social Networking, a word so common among youngsters in the present has somewhat taken over their world. It has become so popular among the hip and young society of today, that it has become almost a way of life for them. Walk into any college computer lab in the US and you’re bound to see dozens of students logged onto a social network (SN). In the last few years with faster internet connections coming into service, the use of social networksRead MoreImpact Of Social Networking On Society950 Words   |  4 PagesAlmost everybody is aware of some impact social networking sites have had on their life. Whether one comes from the generation before the advances in technology, the generation during the technological advances, or the generation born into the world full of technology, it is all the same; technology has impacted their life. The impact, however, may either be positive or negative. With the way today’s social networking sites (SNS) are working, there seems to be more negatives ar ound than the positives

What is Gender Identity Free Essays

The human body is amazing. And even though there are many researchers that conduct studies on human anatomy, there are so many questions that are unanswered still to this day. We will write a custom essay sample on What is Gender Identity? or any similar topic only for you Order Now But what we do know has helped many people and continues to benefit certain theories that have been made over many centuries. One part of the human body that has lots of answered and unanswered questions is gender identity. There are many factors when it comes to gender identity. Some people think simply: Men act as men, women act as women, and man to be with woman. It has been thought to be the â€Å"right way† for many centuries. But people are all different and to think that one way is the right way would be a misunderstanding of how the body works and what can happen to the human body if something is out of tune. Gender identity can be defined as a person’s inner sense of being male or female. Gender identity is believed to be developed during early childhood an effect of how the child was brought up by parents and societal influences. When the child reaches puberty, the influences are reinforced by hormones. Is gender identity a result of nature of nurture? What are the biological factors that play a role in gender identity? What is the difference between how the male and female develop? Does nature or nurture play a bigger role in gender identity? This will all be discussed later on in this essay, along with some of the arguments about sexual identity and how evidence from biopsychology may help resolve these arguments. There are many roles that play a part in sexual differentiation, as well as gender identity. Some of those roles are tied to biological factors or nature and yet others may be linked to environmental influences or nurture. It is impossible to know all the details, but we do know a great deal of how the body of a male versus the body of a female. The role of biological factors is largely dependent on hormones in the body system, as well as genes, gonads, chromosomes, and anatomy. During childhood, levels of circulating gonadal hormones are low, reproductive organs are immature, and males and females differ little in general appearance (Pinel 2009). When a child reaches puberty, the body makes significant changes. These changes can be seen and even heard, but these changes are also different in a boy than in a girl. While both male and female have many similarities, both also have many differences within the body. The differences in chromosomes and hormones are what completes the natural evolution of a child into an adult and ultimately decides whether the sex of a person is male or female at birth. When speaking of hormones, most people will think of testosterone for men and estrogens for women. But in fact, women produce testosterone and men produce estrogen. The difference is the ratio in which the body produces these two types of hormones. Men produce more testosterone and women produce more estrogen. There are many differences like the example above in the bodies of male and female. Increases in the release of gonadotropic hormone and adrenocorticotropic hormone cause the gonads and adrenal cortex to increase their release of gonadal and adrenal hormones, which in turn initiate the maturation of the genitals and the development of secondary sex characteristics (Pinel 2009). Along with biological roles, it is also believed that the environment or surrounding of a person may be a factor of gender identity. Some of these nurture factors include one’s self-concept, social and political attitudes, and perceptions and relationships about other people. Family, peers, schooling, religious training, mass media, and popular culture are just a few of the agents through which gender socialization happens (Crossman, 2012). Through this evaluation, making a conclusion on which has more of an influence on gender identity, nature or nurture, is a hard decision to make. Reading and hearing of stories of people’s gender identity crisis has a pull towards nature, but nurture still has a big role in gender identity as well. Gender identity shapes how we think about others and ourselves and also influences our behaviors (Crossman, 2012). For example, gender differences exist in the likelihood of drug and alcohol abuse, violent behavior, depression, and aggressive driving. Gender identity also has an especially strong effect on our feelings about our appearance and our body image, especially for females (Crossman, 2012). Each of these can be linked both to biological and environment factors. The story that may have the most evident factor is the story of the twin that lost his penis. After losing his penis to a circumcision procedure, the doctor advised the parents to let doctors perform a surgery in which they castrate the boy and create an artificial vagina, and raising the boy as a female. The parents agreed, but it would later prove that their child was not acting or wanting to act as a girl. In fact, the child wanted to do things that a normal man would do and took no interest in any female activities, like playing with dolls. Even with treatment, the child still developed as a man would. When approached with an estrogen regimen at the age of twelve, the child refused not liking the changes of the estrogen. At fourteen, the now teenager decided to live as a male. Shortly after, the twin’s father decided to share the truth with his son. Now the kid could have an identity not only of himself but of his gender. He requested androgen treatment and surgery that would remove the breast and create a penis. The man regained use of his new penis with the help of androgen treatment, but was never able to reproduce children of his own. In the end, the doctors and parents could not change how the boy felt on the inside. Just how much influence does nurture have on gender identity? It could just depend on the situation in itself. There are many arguments that surround gender identity. Theorists have come up with their own opinions and views regarding gender and the why gender inequality exist. Functionalist theorists argue that men fill instrumental roles in society while women fill expressive roles, which works to the benefit of society (Crossman, 2012). Further, it is our socialization into prescribed roles that is the driving force behind gender inequality. For example, these theorists see wage inequalities as the result of choices women make, which involve family roles that compete with their work roles (Crossman, 2012). Symbolic interactionists look at gender from the micro perspective and examine gender stratification on a day-to-day level. For example, men are more likely to interrupt women in conversations and their workspaces generally reflect greater power. These theorists also focus on how gender roles are internalized by males and females (Crossman, 2012). Conflict theorists view women as disadvantaged because of power inequalities between women and men that are built into the social structure. For example, from this viewpoint, wage inequalities that exist between men and women result from men’s historic power to devalue women’s work and benefit as a group from the services that women’s labor provides (Crossman, 2012). Feminist theory emerged out of the women’s movement and aims to understand the position of women in society for the sole purpose of improving their position in society. There are four major frameworks that have developed out of feminist theory: liberal feminism, socialist feminism, radical feminism, and multiracial feminism. People will always have their own opinion about gender (Crossman, 2012). There may never be a way to solve these arguments, not until there is scientific proof or people can decide on which opinion they believe is all true. Gender identity is one’s sense of being male or female. Both biological (nature) factors and environment (nurture) influences play roles in both sexual differentiation and gender identity. Hormones are the biggest biological factor and the biggest environment influence is how one is brought up in their childhood. During the evaluation, I have thought about nature being more of a factor when it comes to gender identity, but have come to the conclusion that it may depend on the situation of a person. Through the years of research, many people have argued over gender identity and gender inequality. Theorists have formed many opinions surrounding gender identity and unless there is some kind of scientific proof the argument may continue. References Pinel, J. P. J. (2009).  Biopsychology  (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Crossman, A.  (2012).  About.com.  Retrieved from http://sociology.about.com/od/Disciplines/a/Sociology-Of- Gender.htm How to cite What is Gender Identity?, Papers

Gays In The Military Essay Research Paper free essay sample

Homosexuals In The Military Essay, Research Paper # 8220 ; Don # 8217 ; t Ask Don # 8217 ; t Tell # 8221 ; and How It # 8217 ; s Affected the Military For about 50 old ages, it has been the U.S. military # 8217 ; s official policy to except homophiles from service. In November 1992, President # 8211 ; elect Clinton told Americans that he planned to raise the military # 8217 ; s long # 8211 ; standing prohibition on homosexuals and tribades. We will write a custom essay sample on Gays In The Military Essay Research Paper or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Homosexual work forces and adult females, he said, should non be prevented from functioning their state based on their sexual orientation. Soon after taking office in 1993, Clinton faced powerful military and congressional resistance to raising the prohibition. General Colin Powell, so # 8211 ; president of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Senator Sam Nunn, who was president of the Senate Armed Forces Committee between 1987 an 1994 and left Congress in 1996, announced that they would seek to barricade his efforts to raise the prohibition. For the following six months, argument raged over what to make about the military # 8217 ; s prohibition on homosexuals and tribades. Clinton # 8217 ; s broad protagonists wanted him to follow through on his promise to raise the prohibition, pressing the demand to stop favoritism against homosexuals and tribades. Conservatives, military leaders and some lawgivers of both parties argued that the presence of declared homophiles in the armed forces would be damaging to military preparedness. They said that allowing homosexuals and tribades serve would destruct all morale and gnaw good subject and order. Ban oppositions maintained that cheery people were capable work forces and adult females who should be allowed to function their county. In July 1993, a via media policy was struck between protagonists and oppositions of the prohibition. The via media, known as # 8220 ; wear # 8217 ; t inquire, wear # 8217 ; t state, # 8221 ; allowed homosexuals and tribades to function in the military every bit long as they did non proclaim their homosexualism or engage in homosexual behavior. Under the policy, military commanding officers would non seek to happen out the sexual orientation of the forces, and homosexual and sapphic forces would non unwrap their sexual orientation. The policy marked a alteration from past pattern in that merely being homosexual was no longer a disqualifier for military service. Conservatives saw the alteration as a too bad relaxation of the absolute prohibition on cheery people. Liberals were dissatisfied because the new policy still allowed the military to throw out homosexuals and tribades if they revealed their orientation. While some progressives disagree with the policy, reasoning that it punishes homosexuals and tribades for prosecuting in the same sorts of behaviour that straight persons are free to prosecute in, they maintain that military leaders should at least abide by the policy and stop their # 8220 ; enchantress Hunts # 8221 ; for homosexual people. Many see the right to function openly in the military as a cardinal civil right for homosexuals and tribades. Groups such as the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network ( SLDN ) and the American Civil Liberties Union ( ACLU ) have supported cheery service members in legal challenges to the policy. In 1997 SLDN documented 563 misdemeanors of the policy. The Clinton disposal and military leaders defend the current policy and the manner it has been enforced. They argue that leting cheery people to function openly would harm military preparedness by destructing military personnels # 8217 ; morale and interrupting order and subject. Policy guardians argue that the armed forces is a particular establishment that holds itself to stricter regulations than those observed by the remainder of society. Because the armed forces must carry through the important mission of supporting the U.S. and its Alliess, they say, its leaders # 8217 ; positions on how to accomplish optimum preparedness should be respected. Pentagon functionaries say that while they believe the current policy is working good, they will look into instances of alleged maltreatment. Gay people have non ever been barred from military service, and in fact, have served in the state # 8217 ; s wars throughout its history. The military # 8217 ; s official stance toward homosexuals and tribades has evolved over clip, frequently in tandem with societal alteration. In the 1920 # 8217 ; s and 1930 # 8217 ; s, homosexualism was treated as a condemnable discourtesy, punishable by imprisonment. That attitude began to alter in the early 1940 # 8217 ; s, when homosexualism came to be viewed as treatable mental unwellness. As the state prepared to come in World Wa R II, military leaders consulted head-shrinkers on the issue of homosexuals and tribades. In 1943, head-shrinkers helped them compose ordinances that barred cheery people from military service. It was non until 1973 that the American Psychiatric Association announced that it no longer classified homosexualism as a mental unwellness. In 1950, those ordinances officially became portion of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Article 125 of that jurisprudence, an anti # 8211 ; sodomy legislative act, prohibits unwritten or anal sex by any service members. During the 1950s, at the tallness of concerns over the spread of Communism around the Earth, military leaders began to see cheery people as # 8220 ; security risks. # 8221 ; It was believed that foreign powers could more easy turn homosexuals and tribades against their state than straight persons since threatened revelations about their personal lives could be used to blackjack them. The 1960s and 1970s proverb progressively rigorous policies enacted against homosexuals and tribades, although in rare instances openly gay forces were allowed to function. Prior to World War II, commanding officers had been given broad latitude in make up ones minding whether to dispatch cheery military personnels, leting virtue and good service to be considered. In the decennaries following the war, nevertheless, even as the homosexual # 8211 ; rights motion gained steam in society at big, military policies became more rigorous. Automatic ejection from the forces had become the norm by the late seventiess. In the 1980s, the ejection of known homosexuals and tribades from the armed forces became compulsory. W. Graham Claytor, deputy defence secretary under President Jimmy Carter, saw to it that Pentagon policy stated that # 8220 ; homosexualism is incompatible with military service. # 8221 ; In 1982, that statement was incorporated into a presidential directive mandating homosexuals # 8217 ; dismissal. Throughout the 1980s, concerns about the spread of AIDS further solidified some military leaders # 8217 ; resistance to leting cheery people to function. The directive remained in topographic point until 1994, when it was supersede by the # 8220 ; wear # 8217 ; t inquire, wear # 8217 ; t state # 8221 ; policy. Between 1980 and 1990, the armed forces discharged an norm of 1,500 service members yearly because of their homosexualism. Defenders of the # 8220 ; wear # 8217 ; t inquire, wear # 8217 ; t state # 8221 ; policy argue that the military must make what it needs to keep the strongest possible contending force. In order to transport out that duty, they say, military leaders must hold the authorization and discretion to put regulations as they see fit to maintain up morale and maintain order. On the issue of cheery people # 8217 ; s service, they say, if military commanding officers maintain that leting homosexuals and tribades to function openly would be damaging to morale and train, so tribunals and public should esteem that determination. Defenders of the prohibition and of the military # 8217 ; s current policy difference the impression that military forces should be afforded the same constitutional protections as civilians. Policy protagonists maintain that the armed forces is a alone establishment with its ain set of regulations. Oppositions of the current policy believe that while the armed forces may hold a particular position in society, tribunals still can non allow it to go against the Constitution. Many homosexual # 8211 ; rights militants and other perceivers view the issue of the intervention of homosexuals and tribades in the military as one of clear # 8211 ; cut favoritism. As the state largest employer, they say, the armed forces should non be allowed to know apart against people based on sexual orientation. Furthermore, they say, the military serves as a symbol for the remainder of society. If the federal authorities itself discriminates against homosexual people, they say, that sends a powerful message to other employers and to society at big I # 8217 ; ve discovered in making this study that some resistance to gay people # 8217 ; s military service is based on moral concerns. I feel that many people believe that homosexualism is incorrect and do non desire the federal authorities to look to excuse it by leting homosexuals and tribades to function openly. Some perceivers point out that homosexual people have non yet been to the full accepted and integrated into society at big. They say that inquiring the armed forces to accept homosexuals and tribades is merely inquiring excessively much.